data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e90/b8e9003e82916ec39f459926ed6745c430785913" alt=""
first impression: poor form, i'd argue. found here. what do you think? good way to steal the hype and make people draw connections between humans and animals--or is it just too soon? (or just too stupid?)
You could be getting your advertising commentary from a more experienced, higher-paid, and prettier ad exec. But the downbeat and bass line are in our hands-- the adstar wannabes climbing the corporate ladder. As yet uncorrupted, somewhat uncouth, and utterly unrestrained, this is the view from the bottom, laid down by a first-year copywriter. Admit it. You're jealous I just might be prettier. According to advertising tradition, that makes me a more viable source of information.
media commentary = blog.
that & randomness = twitter.
[&tip me off?] AIM: thegirlRiot
[or] thegirlriot [at] gmail [dot] com
i live many places online
[&more on me?] revolution, inc.
[see also:] www & tumblr
Urban Dictionary: the girl Riot
i'm an Agent of mass distraction.
[&also a 20somethingblogger.]
[putting my influence where my mouth is]
1 comment:
poor form, poor taste, poor execution. no pun intended. as someone who actually does care about animals in a slaughter house, AND passengers on buses, i -at the very least- should be someone who's moved by this ad. i'm not. matter of fact, i'm going, bad PETA, no.
Post a Comment