alright, i don't hate boobs. but i do hate keira knightley. her poor excuse, stoic, mouth-acting has ruined every single period piece film for the past half a decade (i won't get into star wars or pirates). and the only historic one she didn't corrupt was overrun with her twin natalie portman.
but, as Adrants has pointed out, keira did something maybe kinda halfway decent (arguably for the first time). she declined post-production touch-ups to enhance her breasts for the collateral on the new movie The Duchess. and you know what? i'm more than okay with that. dare i say i wish other actresses would follow suit.
it's nice for someone to make a stand like that and say, my body is good the way it is. kudos to keira for that. the real thing is, though, i wonder how many magazines are going to cover this information, or is it just going to be an afterthought (somewhere after the thought 'did she get a breast reduction?'). i recognize it's all over google and the celeb dish blogs, but i'm talking about the kids.
i would love for a girls' magazine to cover this, interview her, and let her be that role model. i want to see it in Elle Girl, in CosmoGirl, in Seventeen, in YM. disappointing to just have it fall by the wayside, covered by us folks intrigued by advertising and photoshop, and not the folks who should be sending the message.
7.30.2008
hate hate: keira knightley. & boobs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Right, but she was happy when Chanel gave her some cleavage in their campaign featuring her.
That's a[nother] good reason to dislike Keira (I can't say hate, don't know her; don't want to know her).
true--she has had enhancements before, she's saying she no longer wants them, i think. if it's meant only for this particular movie poster, than i dislike her more than previously. if that's at all possible.
Post a Comment